Digging up the building blocks of language: Age-of-acquisition effects for multiword phrases

with age--evidence from an automatic procedure for identifying theproductive units of language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 175–88.Brysbaert, M., & Ghyselinck, M. (2006). The effect of age of acquisition: Partlyfrequency related, partly frequency independent. Visual Cognition, 13(7-8), 992– 1011.Bybee, J. (1998). The Emergent Lexicon. In The 34th Chicago Linguistic Society (pp.421–435). [Type text] [Type text] [Type text] 34Bybee, J., & Scheibman, J. (1999). The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: Thereduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37(4), 575–596.Catling, J., South, F., & Dent, K. (2013). The effect of age of acquisition on olderindividuals with and without cognitive impairments, The Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 66, 1963-1973Catling, J., Dent, K., Preece, E., & Johnston, R. (2013). Age-of-acquisition effects innovel picture naming: a laboratory analogue. Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology (2006), 66(9), 1756–63.Chater, N., McCauley, S.M. & Christiansen, M.H. (2016). Language as skill:Intertwining comprehension and production. Journal of Memory and Language, 89,244-254.Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Christiansen, M.H. & Chater, N. (2016a). Creating language: Integrating evolution,acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Christiansen, M.H. & Chater, N. (2016b). The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamentalconstraint on language. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 39, e62.doi:10.1017/S0140525X1500031XCieri, C., Miller, D., & Walker, K. (2004). The Fisher Corpus: A resource for the nextgenerations of speech-to-text. In Proceedings of the Language Resources andEvaluation Conference.Croft, B. (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress. Diessel, H. (2007). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, anddiachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(2), 108–127.Ellis, A. W., & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexicalretrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,24(2), 515–523.Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native andsecond language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics,. and TESOL.TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396. Arnon, McCauley & Christiansen, (in press). Journal of Memory and Language 35Elman, J. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledgewithout a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33, 547–582.Fitzpatrick, T., & Wray, A. (2006). Breaking up is not so hard to do: Individualdifferences in L2 memorization. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1),35–56.Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and thecumulative frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-taskinvestigation, Acta Psychologia, 115, 43-67.Godfrey, J., Holliman, E., & McDaniel, J. (1992). SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speechcorpus for research and development. In Proceedings of ICASSP–92 (pp. 517–520).Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Izura, C., Pérez, M. A., Agallou, E., Wright, V. C., Marín, J., Stadthagen-González, H., &Ellis, A. W. (2011). Age/order of acquisition effects and the cumulative learning offoreign words: A word training study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1), 32–58.Janssen, N., & Barber, H. (2012). Phrase frequency effects in language production. PloSOne, 7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033202Johnston, R. A., & Barry, C. (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing. VisualCognition, 13(7-8), 789–845. Jolsvai, H., McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2013). Meaning overridesfrequency in idiomatic and compositional multiword chunks. In N. Knauff, M.Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th AnnualConference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 692–697). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Juhasz, B. J. (2005). Age-of-Acquisition effects in word and picture identification.Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 684–712.Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The role of age of acquisition and word frequency inreading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 13(7-8), 846–863.doi:10.1080/13506280544000075Katz, S.M. (1996). Distribution of content words and phrases in text and languagemodeling. Natural Language Engineering, 2, 15-59. [Type text] [Type text] [Type text] 36Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., &Brysbaert;, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisitionratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–90.doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites.Stanford University Press.Lewis, M. B., Gerhand, S. & Ellis, H. D. (2001). Re-evaluating the age-of-acquisitioneffect: Are they simply cumulative frequency effects? Cognition, 78, 189-205.Lieven, E. (2010). Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency.Lingua, 120(11), 2546–2556.Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: ausage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30(2), 333–370. Lieven, E., Salomo, D., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-old children’s production ofmultiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 481–507.Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of CognitiveLinguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 168–196). New York andLondon: Routledge.Maermillod, M., Bonin, P., Meot, A., Ferrand, L., & Paindavoine, M. (2012). Computational evidence that frequency trajectory theory does not oppose butemerges from Age-of-Acquisition theory, Cognitive Science, 36, 1499-1531.McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2011). Learning simple statistics for languagecomprehension and production: The CAPPUCCINO model. In L. Carlson, C.Holscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of theCognitive Science Society (pp. 1619–1624). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.McCauley, S.M. & Christiansen, M.H. (2013). Towards a unified account ofcomprehension and production in language development. Behavioral & BrainSciences, 36, 38-39.McCauley, S.M. & Christiansen, M.H. (2014). Acquiring formulaic language: Acomputational model. Mental Lexicon, 9, 419-436. Arnon, McCauley & Christiansen, (in press). Journal of Memory and Language 37McCauley, S.M. & Christiansen, M.H. (submitted). Computational investigations ofmultiword chunks in language learning.McClelland, J. L. (2010). Emergence in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science,2(4), 751–770.McClelland, J. L., M, B., Noelle, D., Plaut, D. C., Rogers, T. T., Seidenberg, M. S., &Smith, L. B. (2010). Letting structure emerge: Connectionist and dynamical systemsapproaches to understanding cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 348–356.Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R.C., Christiansen, M.H. & Kirby, S. (2014). How arbitrary islanguage? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,369, 20130299.Moore, V., & Valentine, T. (1998). Naming faces: The effect of AoA on speed andaccuracy of naming famous faces. The Quarterly Journal of Psychology, 51, 458–513.Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of Acquisition Norms for aLarge Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and OtherVariables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(3),528–559.Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisitionin word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 116–133.Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., Chappell, T., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age and age ofacquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis. EuropeanJournal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 435–459.Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2012). Burstiness of verbs and derived nouns. In Shall we play theFestschrift game? (pp. 99-115). Berlin: Springer,Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535.Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 6(11), 456–463. [Type text] [Type text] [Type text] 38Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2007). Word chunk frequencies affect the processing ofpronominal object-relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology(2006), 60(2), 161–70.Stewart, N. & Ellis, A. (2008). Order of acquisition in learning perceptual categories: alaboratory analogy of the age-of-acquisition effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,15, 70-74.Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of languageacquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages oflexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks.Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613. Tremblay, A., & Tucker, B. V. (2011). The effects of N-gram probabilistic measures onthe recognition and production of four-word sequences. The Mental Lexicon, 6(2),302–324.Wray, A. (1999). Survey article. Language Teaching, 32, 213–231.Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading andother tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1–29. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud:Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory and Cognition, 32,31–38. Arnon, McCauley & Christiansen, (in press). Journal of Memory and Language 39Appendix 1: Full list of items from Experiment 1 with plausibility ratings (scale from 1-7), frequencies (per million words based on child-directed speech), subjective AoAratings (in years), and adult trigram frequency (per million words based on Fisher corpus) EarlytrigramEarlyplausibilityET-child-freqET-age-ratingLate trigram LT-plausibilityLT-childfreqLT-ageratingAdultfreq a good boy 6.36 58.2 3.43 a good mother 6.44 0 4.31 0.52a good girl 6.47 44.2 3.56 a good dad 6.52 0 5.06 0.39all the pieces 5.61 15.0 4.65 all the rooms 5.33 0.4 4.87 0.25are you done 6.58 26.3 4.18 are you real 5.02 0.2 5 0.47at school today 6.63 15.4 4.78 at two today 5.63 0 6.71 0.04can eat it 5.75 13.0 3.46 can change it 5.47 0.2 5.62 0.7can you push 5.63 13.3 4.25 as you push 4.83 0 6.62 0.04don't throw it 6.22 20.2 3.56 don't fear it 4.94 0 5.06 0.47done with this 6.13 13.0 5.15 through with this 5.63 0.4 4.53 0.08for the baby 6.44 19.6 4 for the men 5.69 0.2 4.5 0.68gonna fix it 5.91 13.7 4.65 gonna treat it 4.19 0 6.25 0.04have a bite 6.41 17.6 3.84 have a wheel 2.47 0.6 5.67 0.08in the bed 6.36 28.7 3.53 in the hands 4.69 0.2 6.46 2.08in the train 5.27 12.8 4.56 in the fourth 4.47 0 4.34 0.76make a car 3.16 12.4 6.06 maybe a car 4.19 0.2 6.71 0.08on the box 5.69 16.1 3.81 on the eye 4.08 0.2 5.09 0.21on the paper 5.3 62.6 3.87 on the third 4.44 0.8 6.56 0.87on the potty 5.77 15.9 2.75 on the beds 4.75 0.6 4.03 0.08on the slide 5.16 14.8 4.25 not the slide 4.11 0.2 4.75 0.04on this page 6.13 25.7 4.56 on this salad 5.14 0 5.56 0.04on your shirt 6.27 20.7 3.78 for your shirt 4.16 0.2 4.5 0.04play with something 5.94 13.5 3.28 play with too 2.86 0.2 3.71 0.04play with those 5.69 15.7 3.37 play with kids 6 0 4.87 0.12read some books 6.63 11.3 4.34 read more books 6.55 0.4 6.87 0.16show me where 6.47 18.3 3.65 show me things 5.52 0 6.06 0.12sit up here 6.02 14.8 3.12 anybody up here 5.94 0 3.84 0.04smell the flowers 6.47 10.9 3.81 fix the flowers 4.22 0 4.12 0.04take them off 6.36 18.3 3.87 take time off 6.47 0 4.71 1.13that's a car 6.02 18.5 3.43 that's a phone 5.97 0.4 3.62 0.08the red one 5.97 41.8 3.09 the earlier one 5.25 0 9.18 0.04use this one 6.52 12.4 4.15 made this one 5.61 0.2 3.62 0.08wanna do that 5.83 28.3 4.18 couldn't do that 6.25 0.2 5.93 4.37wanna sit down 6.13 18.5 3.12 couldn't sit down 6.16 0 7.12 0.16want some help 6.61 10.9 4.12 want good help 4.66 0 6.9 0.04you can't play 6.33 25.5 4.21 you can't give 4.63 1.5 5.03 1.22yougonna help 5.63 15.7 4.21 yougonna change 4.11 0.2 4.43 0.04you push it 5.8 16.8 3.81 you mail it 5.72 0.2 4.71 0.12you threw it 5.91 14.1 3.75 you fed it 4.5 0 7.51 0.04youwanna talk 6.22 13.0 4.9 you couldn't talk 5.25 0 6.12 1.73you'regonna fall 6.13 14.6 3.4 you'regonna quit 5.91 0 6.25 0.04 [Type text] [Type text] [Type text] 40Appendix 2: Full list of items from Experiment 2 with plausibility ratings (scale from 1-7), frequencies (per million words based on child-directed speech), subjective AoAratings (in years), and adult trigram frequency (per million words based on Fisher corpus) EarlytrigramEarlyplausibilityET-child-freqET-age-ratingLate trigram LT-plausibilityLT-child-freqLT-age-ratingAdult-freq a big truck 6.29 9.4 3.3 a big key 4.97 0.19 4.1 0.45a good book 6.29 10.6 5.2 a good team 6.26 0.00 7.2 1.95a good girl 6.14 44.5 4.8 a good mother 6.26 0.00 4.6 0.55all the pieces 5.67 13.0 4.7 all the parties 4.65 0.00 6.9 0.28are you drawing 6.15 11.1 3.6 are you proud 6.38 0.19 6.3 0.05are you eating 6.53 35.3 3.8 are you black 5.38 0.00 6.2 0.35don’t see it 6.21 24.7 4.0 don’t see that 5.26 0.57 4.4 11.15down the slide 5.82 24.5 3.5 down the bend 5.00 0.00 7.8 0.05for the baby 6.02 19.2 3.6 for the teacher 6.18 0.38 5.2 0.80get the book 6.47 9.8 4.3 get the number 5.74 0.38 5.9 0.53going to bed 6.59 14.3 3.0 going to pass 5.41 0.19 7.0 1.03had a farm 5.59 15.7 3.9 had a boat 4.88 0.19 5.0 0.90have a cookie 6.56 10.9 2.9 have a costume 4.65 0.57 4.4 0.15have a snack 6.62 9.4 3.2 have a photo 4.32 0.00 5.3 0.20i got one 6.09 10.0 3.6 i got out 6.03 0.94 4.3 12.78if you’re happy 6.18 24.0 4.7 if you’re running 5.26 0.00 5.6 0.60in a box 6.35 17.5 3.4 in a magazine 6.21 0.19 5.7 1.93in my hair 6.06 10.4 3.8 in my view 5.97 0.00 7.6 0.60in my pocket 6.44 12.3 3.7 in my forties 6.26 0.00 9.5 2.15in the bag 6.26 76.6 4.7 in the magazines 5.88 0.00 5.9 0.55in the bathroom 6.56 14.3 3.2 in the streets 6.26 0.19 4.8 4.33in the bed 6.26 39.8 3.4 in the heart 4.94 0.19 6.2 2.30in the hat 4.59 18.5 4.1 in the ears 4.47 0.00 4.3 0.23in the pool 6.29 11.5 3.9 in the papers 5.21 0.00 6.3 3.93in the potty 5.44 10.9 2.9 in the boot 4.41 0.19 6.1 0.15in the sandbox 6.03 9.8 3.6 in the shadows 5.91 0.00 6.0 0.10in the store 6.41 11.7 4.5 in the restaurant 6.44 0.38 5.5 5.58in the sun 5.56 9.8 4.3 in the bible 6.35 0.00 5.8 4.55in the trash 6.41 15.8 3.8 in the hills 5.06 0.19 5.3 1.60in the zoo 5.91 13.6 4.0 in the beaches 3.24 0.00 5.7 0.10on the book 4.74 13.4 4.1 on the cat 4.29 0.00 3.9 0.98on the tree 5.24 11.7 3.9 on the windows 4.62 0.38 4.5 0.45on this page 6.38 23.8 5.5 on this hill 5.47 0.19 4.9 0.05pick you up 6.21 26.6 4.0 set you up 5.44 0.38 7.7 0.98see the book 5.76 10.0 2.9 see the number 5.15 0.00 4.1 0.20sit up here 5.82 16.4 3.1 run up here 5.50 0.00 4.1 0.05some more juice 5.94 13.8 3.1 some more seats 5.18 0.00 5.8 0.05that was nice 6.79 11.9 3.7 that was real 6.03 0.19 5.8 4.80that’s a baby 5.85 24.3 3.2 thats a plane 6.35 1.13 3.6 0.05 Arnon, McCauley & Christiansen, (in press). Journal of Memory and Language 41to the baby 5.12 11.5 3.2 to the girls 4.56 0.57 4.7 0.50to the bath 4.74 10.0 3.1 to the babysitter 5.47 0.38 4.9 0.15under the chair 6.15 10.6 3.2 under the sea 5.88 1.51 4.8 0.05wipe it off 6.62 11.9 3.6 throws it off 4.32 0.00 6.4 0.10with the toys 5.38 12.8 3.4 with the boxes 5.03 0.00 4.6 0.10you can write 6.32 9.8 4.6 you can win 6.41 0.00 4.9 1.70you pull it 5.38 14.3 4.3 you pass it 4.50 0.19 5.4 0.68